The Bible doesn’t mention “white” people. Gen Z. You Should Know the truth

Key Points & Accuracy:

The Bible doesn’t mention “white” people. So, why are all  photos in the Bible that of White people?

The depiction of biblical figures as white people in art, literature, and media is a product of cultural and historical influences, rather than biblical accuracy.

1. European cultural dominance: During the Middle Ages and Renaissance, European artists and writers dominated the production of biblical art and literature. As a result, they often depicted biblical figures with European features.
2. Lack of historical representation: Until recent times, there was a lack of representation and understanding of Middle Eastern and African cultures in European art and literature.
3. Artistic license: Artists often took creative liberties when depicting biblical scenes, using their imagination to fill in gaps in the biblical narrative.
4. Cultural bias and racism: Unfortunately, some depictions of biblical figures as white people may have been influenced by racist attitudes and a desire to promote European cultural superiority.

It’s essential to recognize that these depictions are not historically accurate and can perpetuate harmful stereotypes. Modern scholarship and artistic interpretations strive to represent biblical figures in a more culturally sensitive and accurate manner. This has contributed to many of the problems of today.

1. Biblical Demographics:

   – Accuracy: The Bible centers on Middle Eastern, Ethiopian, etc figures (Abraham, Moses, Jesus, etc.), with no mention of “white people” as defined post-15th century. It was during this time that Europeans began to categorize people based on skin colors creating a false narrative of superiority and inferiority. (e.g., Song of Solomon 1:5-6), and identity is tied to tribe/nation (e.g., “ethnos” for Gentiles in the NT).

2. Race as a Social Construct:

   – Scholarly Consensus: Supported by historians like Audrey Smedley. Racial hierarchies emerged during European colonialism to justify exploitation, notably the transatlantic slave trade. The term “race” gained pseudoscientific traction in the 18th century.

3. Theological Implications:

   – Biblical Equality: Aligns with verses such as Galatians 3:28, emphasizing unity in Christ. The critique of color bias resonates with progressive Christian ethics, though some may contest mixing faith with social justice.

Strengths:

– Historical Context: Effectively traces the origins of racial categorization to colonialism, linking it to systemic oppression.

– Ethical Call to Action: Challenges Christians to confront racism and embrace inclusivity, rooted in the belief that all are “made in God’s image” (Genesis 1:27).

Considerations:

– Nuance in Causation: While race justified colonialism/slavery, economic and political factors also played roles. The text simplifies this but appropriately focuses on race’s ideological role.

– Biblical Diversity: Acknowledging figures like the Ethiopian eunuch (Acts 8:27-39) could strengthen the case for the Bible’s inclusion of diverse peoples without modern racial frameworks.

Counterarguments:

– Avoidance of “Modern Concepts”: Critics might argue the Bible doesn’t address many contemporary issues, but the text’s focus on rejecting harmful constructs remains valid.

– Cultural vs. Racial Identity: Some may conflate biblical ethnic distinctions (e.g., Jew/Gentile) with race, but the text correctly distinguishes ancient cultural identity from modern racialization.

A poignant and thought-provoking statement from tik4tat.com!

The truth being revealed, many institutions and individuals continue to perpetuate false narratives, including the misrepresentation of biblical figures and the promotion of racist ideologies.

This highlights the deeply ingrained nature of these falsehoods and the significant challenge we face in dismantling them.

As we try to aptly put it, “we have a long fight ahead.” It will require sustained efforts, courage, and perseverance to:

1. Expose and challenge false teachings
2. Promote accurate information and education
3. Support marginalized communities and voices
4. Advocate for policy changes and institutional reforms

Ultimately, it is a collective responsibility to create a more just and equitable society, where truth and accuracy are valued and promoted. Let us continue to shed light on these important issues and work together towards a brighter future!

*Conclusion:

Our conclusion is a well-supported, persuasive piece that aligns historical scholarship with theological principles. It encourages a reevaluation of race through a faith lens, advocating for equity while acknowledging the Bible’s Middle Eastern roots. Minor simplifications do not detract from its core message, making it a thoughtful contribution to discussions on faith and justice.

If we made you upset. Then we did our job.

tik4tat research team                                                                                                                                                        Your Life-Your Future